Car Comparison: Nissan Navara vs Mitsubishi L200 vs Ford Ranger



Specs Comparison
Hide Common Specs
Fuel Economy
Fuel Tank Capacity Fuel Tank Capacity 80 Liters 75 Liters 80 Liters Fuel Average City Fuel Average City 8.3 Km/L 10 Km/L 10.9 Km/L Engine / Motor
Top Speed Top Speed 160 KM/H 169 KM/H 170 KM/H Drive Type Drive Type Rear Wheel Drive Rear Wheel Drive All Wheel Drive Fuel Type Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline Diesel Cylinders Cylinders 4 4 - Torque Torque 233 Nm 202 Nm 375 Nm Acceleration Acceleration 11.6 seconds 11 seconds 12.5 seconds Engine Capacity Engine Capacity 2.5 Liters 2.4 Liters 2.2 Liters Horsepower Horsepower 158 BHP 128 BHP 148 BHP Dimensions
Wheelbase Wheelbase 3150 millimeters 3000 millimeters 3197 millimeters Seating Capacity Seating Capacity 6 Seater 3 Seater 5 Seater Width Width 2075 millimeters 1815 millimeters 1811 millimeters Height Height 1758 millimeters 1780 millimeters 1719 millimeters Length Length 5336 millimeters 5300 millimeters 5171 millimeters Number Of Doors Number Of Doors - - 4 Doors Transmission & Drivetrain
Transmission Transmission Manual Manual Automatic
Features Comparison
Hide common features
Comfort & Convenience
Power Windows Power Windows Parking Sensor Rear Parking Sensor Rear Parking Sensor Front Parking Sensor Front Tyre Pressure Warning System Tyre Pressure Warning System Interior
Tuner/radio Tuner/radio Aux Audio In Aux Audio In Air Conditioning Air Conditioning Usb Usb Safety
Traction Control Traction Control Abs Abs Rear Wheel Drive Rear Wheel Drive Airbags (front And Side) Airbags (front And Side)
Compare Nissan Navara with Similar Cars
- VSNissan NavaraMitsubishi L200
- VSNissan NavaraIsuzu D-Max
- VSNissan NavaraFord Ranger
Compare Mitsubishi L200 with Similar Cars
- VSMitsubishi L200Ford Ranger
Compare Ford Ranger with Similar Cars
- VSFord RangerFord F-150
- VSFord RangerFord Escape